A Brief Comparison of Psychoanalytic and Person-Centered Therapy

Within the survey of counseling and therapy there are endless hypothetical posts, each of which germinate different perspectives on pityingity and afford varying counselor roles. devotion of the implications of these dissimilar orientations is essential in the process of choosing the grant therapy for an individual. As an illustration, show the stark contrast between psychoanalytic therapy and person-centered therapy. The core of any theoretical approach in psychological science lies in the unique interpretation of homo nature.Sigmund Freud founder of the psychoanalytic movement, had an extremely deterministic quite a little of the human fetch (Corey, 2009). According to Freud a combination of unconscious, irrational motivations and instinctual drives that lie outside of unitys conscious control serve as the basis for unitarys personality (Corey, 2009). These irrational forces include Eros the innate t angiotensin converting enzyme instinct responsible for sexual ene rgy and our desire to survive, and Thatanos the innate finish instinct responsible for aggression (Burger, 2008).In addition, Freud placed a heavy strain on the role of childishness experiences and sexuality in personality development. psychoanalytical possibility verifys that most of the conflict experienced in adulthood is a result of repress unconscious satisfying from childhood (Burger, 2008). The psychoanalytic view of human nature is quite contrary to the human-centered outlook. Carl Rogers founder of the humanistic psychology movement, developed a more optimistic view of human nature.This approach asserts that at the core of each individual lies a arrogant center, which is composed of trustworthiness and capability (Corey, 2009). Person-centered therapy is centered on the legal opinion that people constitute an innate actualizing tendency which drives an individual to strive for appendage and personal fulfillment (Corey, 2009). Although past experiences are not ign ored in therapy the idiom on offshoot, development, and competence proposes that traumatic past experiences discharge be overcome by finding meaning and purpose in ones life (Corey, 2009).Given their varying interpretations of human nature and psyche, person-centered therapists and psychoanalytic therapists launch very different roles in their practice. Because the determination of psychoanalytic therapy is to bring repressed unconscious material to light, the therapist utilizes a blank-screen approach (Corey, 2009). Although they initially establish some rapport with the leaf node psychoanalytic therapists assume an anonymous stance for the majority of therapy by behaving in a neutral, impersonal manner (Corey, 2009).The goal of this approach is to foster transference in which clients project repressed emotions onto the naive therapist (Corey, 2009). The main role of a psychoanalytic therapist is that of an interpreter. Therapy employs various techniques intended to evoke un conscious memories such as transference, dream-analysis, projection tests, and dissolve association (Burger, 2008). These repressed memories are often ambiguous and puzzling to the client thus therapists provide guidance in understanding and confronting the meaning of this material (Burger, 2008).In contrast, the goal of person-centered therapy is to create a nurturing environment which fosters the clients actualizing tendencies and growth (Corey, 2009). The relationship between therapist and client is equal, meaning that the therapist can hold no dominant role (Corey, 2009). Rather than advising and interpreting, the therapist entirely serves as a model for the patient. In high society to be appropriate models, three characteristics are required of person-centered therapists (Corey, 2009).Firstly, they must have congruency in their birth lives by being genuine and honest with themselves. Person-centered therapists must also experience their clients with unconditional positive regard (Corey, 2009). This vital concept assumes that therapists can ask their clients without any judgment, and deeply care for people beyond the obligations of their occupation. Lastly, therapists must have a true empathetic understanding of their clients. Person-centered therapists should be able to uphold to their clients feelings and experiences as if they were their admit (Corey, 2009).Cumulatively these three qualities create an unresolved relationship in which the client is free to express themselves and grow as an individual. Due to the intrinsic differences between psychoanalytic and person-centered therapy, it is necessary to examine their strengths and weaknesses in application. Freudian psychoanalytic therapy has been modified greatly over time collectable to many flaws in the therapeutic process. The most notable of these shortcomings is the intense emphasis on childhood experience in personality development (Burger, 2008).Critics declare that psychoanalytic ther apy ignores the significant role of post-developmental and current life circumstances on mental health. In addition, the therapeutic process in lengthy and dearly-won limiting its application to those in well-off socioeconomic standing (Corey, 2009). on that point are however many beneficial uses of contemporary psychoanalytic therapy. almost argue that because all people are affected by childhood experiences, therapy can be applicable cross culturally assuming therapists bear a multicultural awareness (Corey, 2009).In addition, brief psychoanalytic therapy is a lustrous new therapeutic approach that aims to limit the time and cost of psychoanalytic therapy while maintaining the focus on the inner psyche thereby broaden its availability (Corey, 2009). Person-centered therapy is currently a more widely utilized body of therapy, but it is not without weaknesses. Critics argue that from a multicultural perspective, the internal locale of evaluation stressed in therapy may not b e meet for some collectivist cultures who value the opinions and standards of other group members over their own (Corey, 2009).Others contend that the non-directive stance of the therapist may not be adequate for those seeking guidance from therapy. Although some aspects of therapy may be flawed, humanistic psychology has been responsible for some major breakthroughs in the field of human resources internationally. humane psychologists have traveled to over 30 countries worldwide in order to assist different cultures in their adoption and modification of humanistic theory and therapy in hopes of promoting global communication and understanding (Corey, 2009).Those who promote person-centered therapy also assert that the key therapeutic conditions of empathy, understanding, and honest caring are essential in promoting growth universally (Corey, 2009). References Burger, J. M. (2008). Personality. (8th ed. ). Belmont, CA Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Corey, G. (2013). Theory and Pract ice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. (9th ed. ). Belmont, CA Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.